SurPRISE and its results…

• EN: SurPRISE Policy Brief
• EN: SurPRISE Factsheet – About the Project
• EN: SurPRISE Factsheet – Methodology
• EN: SurPRISE Brochure – The Project in a Nutshell
• EN: SurPRISE Citizen Feedback UK
• ES: Proyecto SurPRISE – Principales Resultados

Information package

– Folder (Danish)

– Folder (Hungarian)

– Folder (English)

– Folder (French)

– Folder (German)

– Folder (Hungarian)

– Folder (Italian)

– Folder (Norwegian)

– Folder (Spanish) 

Description of the SurPRISE project’s partners 

Joint conference of SurPRISE, PRISMS and PACT – Download Material 

– Abstract Booklet

– Programme

DAY 1

• Recommendations of the EGE on the ethics of surveillance and security technologies
  Julian Kinderlerer, European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE), Belgium
• Key findings of the three projects SurPRISE, PRISMS and PACT
  PACT: J. Peter Burgess, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Norway
  PRISMS: Michael Friedewald, Fraunhofer ISI, Germany
  SurPRISE: Johann ČAS, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA/OEAW), Austria
• Voicing and addressing European complaints
  Peter Hustinx, European Data Protection Supervisor, Belgium

Day 2

Session 1

• Jelena Budak & Rajh Edo (Institute of Economics, Croatia): Citizens’ privacy concerns – does national culture matter?
• María Del Carmen Hidalgo, Fernando Casado & Antonio Maña (University of Malaga, Spain): Citizens’ perceptions on surveillance, security and privacy: A psychosocial perspective
• Michael Friedewald (Fraunhofer ISI, Germany) & Marc van Lieshout (TNO, Netherlands) (PRISMS): Citizens’ attitudes and preferences regarding privacy and security

Session 2

• Jacob Skjødt Nielsen (Danish Board of Technology – DBT, Denmark) & Marta Szenay  (Medián, Hungary) (SurPRISE): Involving Citizens in security policy making
• Bernadette Somody (Eötvös Károly Policy Institute, Hungary), Máté Dániel Szabó (University of Miskolc, Hungary) & Iván Székely (Eötvös Károly Policy Institute, Hungary): Moving away from the security-privacy trade-off: the use of the test of proportionality in decision support
• Dimitris Kyriazanos, Olga Segou, Anastassios Bravakis & Stelios C. A. Thomopoulos (National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Greece) (PACT): The PACT Decision Support tool for Privacy, Ethics and Social Impact Assessment of Surveillance Technology Investments

Session 3

• Sunil Patil (RAND, UK) (PACT): Privacy, security and surveillance preferences of European citizens – overview of PACT’s empirical findings
• Evelien De Pauw & Hans Vermeersch (Vives, Belgium): Framing effects on the acceptance of surveillance-oriented security technologies
• Sara Degli Esposti (Open University – OU, UK), Vincenzo Pavone & Elvira Santiago-Gómez (Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas – CSIC, Spain) (SurPRISE): Aligning security and privacy: en route toward acceptable surveillance

Session 4

• Gemma Galdon Clavell & Philippe Mamadou Frowd (Eticas Research & Consulting, Spain): Assessing security technologies: a methodology for societal impacts on diverse stakeholders

• Jaime Martin Perez (ATOS, Spain) (PACT): Overview of the PACT Privacy Reference Framework for Security Technology (PRFST)

• Matthias Leese & Peter Bescherer (University of Tuebingen, Germany): Between participation and securitization? A bottom-up perspective on urban security

Session 5

• Georg Markus Kainz & Christian Jeitler (quintessenz, Austria): The dangers of boundless surveillance in a democratic society
• Lilian Mitrou, Prokopios Drogkaris & George Leventakis (Center for Security Studies – KEMEA, Greece): Legal and social aspects of surveillance technologies: CCTV in Greece
• Florian Idelberger (European University Institute, Italy): Privacy and security through technical solutions and their regulation – Will the law of the future be written in code?

Session 6

• Gloria González Fuster (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium) (PRISMS): Judging public perceptions of privacy: Should law actually care about what people think?
• Dara Hallinan (Fraunhofer ISI, Germany): Can dynamic groups be protected under the data protection regulation?
• Maria Grazia Porcedda (European University Institute, Italy) (SurPRISE): Citizens’ recommendations on law and privacy at the SurPRISE summits: a litmus test for current policy initiatives?

Session 7

• Jenneke Christiaens & Francesca Menichelli (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium) (PRISMS): Beyond the trade off between privacy and security? Organisational routines and individual strategies at the security check
• Luisa Marin (University of Twente, Netherlands): The deployment of drones technology in border surveillance and the challenges to privacy
• Dimitris Tsapogas (University of Vienna, Austria): Digital citizenship after Snowden: self-regulation and the need for critical education strategies

Session 8

• Georgios Kolliarikis (University of Frankfurt, Germany): The discreet charm of impact assessments: Contesting the evidence base for security research policy
• Stefan Strauss (Institute of Technology Assessment – ITA/OEAW, Austria) (SurPRISE): Privacy vs. security – a given trade-off?
• Jana Weitkamp (Fraunhofer ISI, Germany) (PRISMS): The role of media in framing security and privacy